LGMLOct 13, 2019

Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks via Approximate Description Length

arXiv:1910.05697v123 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides improved generalization guarantees for neural networks, which is significant for machine learning practitioners seeking theoretical understanding of model performance, though it is incremental as it builds on existing norm-based bounds.

The paper tackles the problem of deriving sample complexity bounds for neural networks with bounded weight norms, showing that the sample complexity is approximately O(dR^2/ε^2), which is optimal up to log-factors and improves over the previous state-of-the-art of O(d^2R^2/ε^2).

We investigate the sample complexity of networks with bounds on the magnitude of its weights. In particular, we consider the class \[ H=\left\{W_t\circρ\circ \ldots\circρ\circ W_{1} :W_1,\ldots,W_{t-1}\in M_{d, d}, W_t\in M_{1,d}\right\} \] where the spectral norm of each $W_i$ is bounded by $O(1)$, the Frobenius norm is bounded by $R$, and $ρ$ is the sigmoid function $\frac{e^x}{1+e^x}$ or the smoothened ReLU function $ \ln (1+e^x)$. We show that for any depth $t$, if the inputs are in $[-1,1]^d$, the sample complexity of $H$ is $\tilde O\left(\frac{dR^2}{ε^2}\right)$. This bound is optimal up to log-factors, and substantially improves over the previous state of the art of $\tilde O\left(\frac{d^2R^2}{ε^2}\right)$. We furthermore show that this bound remains valid if instead of considering the magnitude of the $W_i$'s, we consider the magnitude of $W_i - W_i^0$, where $W_i^0$ are some reference matrices, with spectral norm of $O(1)$. By taking the $W_i^0$ to be the matrices at the onset of the training process, we get sample complexity bounds that are sub-linear in the number of parameters, in many typical regimes of parameters. To establish our results we develop a new technique to analyze the sample complexity of families $H$ of predictors. We start by defining a new notion of a randomized approximate description of functions $f:X\to\mathbb{R}^d$. We then show that if there is a way to approximately describe functions in a class $H$ using $d$ bits, then $d/ε^2$ examples suffices to guarantee uniform convergence. Namely, that the empirical loss of all the functions in the class is $ε$-close to the true loss. Finally, we develop a set of tools for calculating the approximate description length of classes of functions that can be presented as a composition of linear function classes and non-linear functions.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes