Blameworthiness in Security Games
This work addresses the need for formal blame attribution in security games, which is incremental as it builds on existing game theory applications.
The paper tackled the problem of assigning blameworthiness to defenders and attackers in security games by defining it using the principle of alternative possibilities and developing a sound and complete logical system for reasoning about it, with axioms that capture information asymmetry.
Security games are an example of a successful real-world application of game theory. The paper defines blameworthiness of the defender and the attacker in security games using the principle of alternative possibilities and provides a sound and complete logical system for reasoning about blameworthiness in such games. Two of the axioms of this system capture the asymmetry of information in security games.