CLAILGNov 9, 2019

Style is NOT a single variable: Case Studies for Cross-Style Language Understanding

arXiv:1911.03663v28 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for better tools in natural language processing to handle complex stylistic variations, though it is incremental in building on existing datasets and methods.

The paper tackles the problem of understanding text style as a combination of multiple factors by introducing a benchmark corpus (xSLUE) for cross-style language understanding, showing that a cross-style classifier improves performance over individual classifiers and revealing dependencies and contradictions among styles.

Every natural text is written in some style. Style is formed by a complex combination of different stylistic factors, including formality markers, emotions, metaphors, etc. One cannot form a complete understanding of a text without considering these factors. The factors combine and co-vary in complex ways to form styles. Studying the nature of the co-varying combinations sheds light on stylistic language in general, sometimes called cross-style language understanding. This paper provides the benchmark corpus (xSLUE) that combines existing datasets and collects a new one for sentence-level cross-style language understanding and evaluation. The benchmark contains text in 15 different styles under the proposed four theoretical groupings: figurative, personal, affective, and interpersonal groups. For valid evaluation, we collect an additional diagnostic set by annotating all 15 styles on the same text. Using xSLUE, we propose three interesting cross-style applications in classification, correlation, and generation. First, our proposed cross-style classifier trained with multiple styles together helps improve overall classification performance against individually-trained style classifiers. Second, our study shows that some styles are highly dependent on each other in human-written text. Finally, we find that combinations of some contradictive styles likely generate stylistically less appropriate text. We believe our benchmark and case studies help explore interesting future directions for cross-style research. The preprocessed datasets and code are publicly available.

Code Implementations2 repos
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes