CLAILGNov 26, 2019

PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language

arXiv:1911.11641v13098 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses a key limitation in AI systems for tasks requiring physical knowledge, though it is incremental as it focuses on benchmarking rather than solving the problem.

The paper tackles the problem of physical commonsense reasoning in natural language understanding by introducing the PIQA benchmark dataset, where large pretrained models achieve only 77% accuracy compared to humans at 95%.

To apply eyeshadow without a brush, should I use a cotton swab or a toothpick? Questions requiring this kind of physical commonsense pose a challenge to today's natural language understanding systems. While recent pretrained models (such as BERT) have made progress on question answering over more abstract domains - such as news articles and encyclopedia entries, where text is plentiful - in more physical domains, text is inherently limited due to reporting bias. Can AI systems learn to reliably answer physical common-sense questions without experiencing the physical world? In this paper, we introduce the task of physical commonsense reasoning and a corresponding benchmark dataset Physical Interaction: Question Answering or PIQA. Though humans find the dataset easy (95% accuracy), large pretrained models struggle (77%). We provide analysis about the dimensions of knowledge that existing models lack, which offers significant opportunities for future research.

Code Implementations2 repos
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes