Is Discriminator a Good Feature Extractor?
This clarifies a theoretical dilemma for researchers using GANs in transfer learning, though it is incremental as it builds on existing studies.
The paper tackles the debate over whether a GAN discriminator is a good feature extractor by showing that its features are robust due to preventing mode collapse, not its classification task, and finds it can succeed in transfer learning but may be inferior to classifier-based extractors when tasks are similar.
The discriminator from generative adversarial nets (GAN) has been used by researchers as a feature extractor in transfer learning and appeared worked well. However, there are also studies that believe this is the wrong research direction because intuitively the task of the discriminator focuses on separating the real samples from the generated ones, making features extracted in this way useless for most of the downstream tasks. To avoid this dilemma, we first conducted a thorough theoretical analysis of the relationship between the discriminator task and the features extracted. We found that the connection between the task of the discriminator and the feature is not as strong as was thought, for that the main factor restricting the feature learned by the discriminator is not the task, but is the need to prevent the entire GAN model from mode collapse during the training. From this perspective and combined with further analyses, we found that to avoid mode collapse, the features extracted by the discriminator are not guided to be different for the real samples, but divergence without noise is indeed allowed and occupies a large proportion of the feature space. This makes the features more robust and helps answer the question as to why the discriminator can succeed as a feature extractor in related research. Consequently, to expose the essence of the discriminator extractor as different from other extractors, we analyze the counterpart of the discriminator extractor, the classifier extractor that assigns the target samples to different categories. We found the performance of the discriminator extractor may be inferior to the classifier based extractor when the source classification task is similar to the target task, which is the common case, but the ability to avoid noise prevents the discriminator from being replaced by the classifier.