LGAIMLJan 31, 2020

Deontological Ethics By Monotonicity Shape Constraints

arXiv:2001.11990v228 citations
AI Analysis

This tackles ethical violations in AI systems for applications involving sensitive attributes, though it is incremental as it builds on existing constraint methods.

The paper addresses the problem of machine-learned systems violating deontological ethical principles like 'favor the less fortunate' by proposing shape constraints to enforce positive responses to relevant inputs, showing this strategy works with attributes such as income and age to produce more responsible AI.

We demonstrate how easy it is for modern machine-learned systems to violate common deontological ethical principles and social norms such as "favor the less fortunate," and "do not penalize good attributes." We propose that in some cases such ethical principles can be incorporated into a machine-learned model by adding shape constraints that constrain the model to respond only positively to relevant inputs. We analyze the relationship between these deontological constraints that act on individuals and the consequentialist group-based fairness goals of one-sided statistical parity and equal opportunity. This strategy works with sensitive attributes that are Boolean or real-valued such as income and age, and can help produce more responsible and trustworthy AI.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes