Coherent and Archimedean choice in general Banach spaces
This work addresses foundational issues in decision theory for researchers, providing a general framework for choice models in Banach spaces, but it is incremental as it builds on existing concepts like Archimedeanity and representation theorems.
The paper introduces a new notion of Archimedeanity for choice models in abstract Banach spaces, using sets of desirable option sets to handle diverse contexts like horse lottery options, and proves representation theorems that axiomatize methods such as Levi's E-admissibility and Walley-Sen maximality.
I introduce and study a new notion of Archimedeanity for binary and non-binary choice between options that live in an abstract Banach space, through a very general class of choice models, called sets of desirable option sets. In order to be able to bring an important diversity of contexts into the fold, amongst which choice between horse lottery options, I pay special attention to the case where these linear spaces don't include all `constant' options.I consider the frameworks of conservative inference associated with Archimedean (and coherent) choice models, and also pay quite a lot of attention to representation of general (non-binary) choice models in terms of the simpler, binary ones.The representation theorems proved here provide an axiomatic characterisation for, amongst many other choice methods, Levi's E-admissibility and Walley-Sen maximality.