LGAIMar 27, 2020

Generation of Consistent Sets of Multi-Label Classification Rules with a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

arXiv:2003.12526v1
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for interpretable classification models in applications like biology and text analysis, offering an incremental improvement by focusing on unordered rule sets and consistency.

The paper tackles the problem of generating interpretable multi-label classification models by proposing a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm that produces rule-based models with guaranteed consistency between rules, eliminating the need for conflict resolution. The results show that their best models achieved comparable F-Score and smaller model sizes compared to state-of-the-art algorithms.

Multi-label classification consists in classifying an instance into two or more classes simultaneously. It is a very challenging task present in many real-world applications, such as classification of biology, image, video, audio, and text. Recently, the interest in interpretable classification models has grown, partially as a consequence of regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation. In this context, we propose a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm that generates multiple rule-based multi-label classification models, allowing users to choose among models that offer different compromises between predictive power and interpretability. An important contribution of this work is that different from most algorithms, which usually generate models based on lists (ordered collections) of rules, our algorithm generates models based on sets (unordered collections) of rules, increasing interpretability. Also, by employing a conflict avoidance algorithm during the rule-creation, every rule within a given model is guaranteed to be consistent with every other rule in the same model. Thus, no conflict resolution strategy is required, evolving simpler models. We conducted experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets and compared our results with state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of predictive performance (F-Score) and interpretability (model size), and demonstrate that our best models had comparable F-Score and smaller model sizes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes