CRLGApr 24, 2020

Why an Android App is Classified as Malware? Towards Malware Classification Interpretation

arXiv:2004.11516v269 citations
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for interpretable malware classification for mobile users and security analysts, but it is incremental as it applies known interpretable ML techniques to a specific domain.

The paper tackles the problem of explaining why Android apps are classified as malware by proposing XMal, an interpretable machine learning approach that achieves high accuracy and provides neural language descriptions of malicious behaviors, revealing behaviors more accurately than existing methods like Drebin and LIME.

Machine learning (ML) based approach is considered as one of the most promising techniques for Android malware detection and has achieved high accuracy by leveraging commonly-used features. In practice, most of the ML classifications only provide a binary label to mobile users and app security analysts. However, stakeholders are more interested in the reason why apps are classified as malicious in both academia and industry. This belongs to the research area of interpretable ML but in a specific research domain (i.e., mobile malware detection). Although several interpretable ML methods have been exhibited to explain the final classification results in many cutting-edge Artificial Intelligent (AI) based research fields, till now, there is no study interpreting why an app is classified as malware or unveiling the domain-specific challenges. In this paper, to fill this gap, we propose a novel and interpretable ML-based approach (named XMal) to classify malware with high accuracy and explain the classification result meanwhile. (1) The first classification phase of XMal hinges multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and attention mechanism, and also pinpoints the key features most related to the classification result. (2) The second interpreting phase aims at automatically producing neural language descriptions to interpret the core malicious behaviors within apps. We evaluate the behavior description results by comparing with the existing interpretable ML-based methods (i.e., Drebin and LIME) to demonstrate the effectiveness of XMal. We find that XMal is able to reveal the malicious behaviors more accurately. Additionally, our experiments show that XMal can also interpret the reason why some samples are misclassified by ML classifiers. Our study peeks into the interpretable ML through the research of Android malware detection and analysis.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes