DALock: Distribution Aware Password Throttling
This addresses the security-usability trade-off in password protection for online systems, offering a novel approach to mitigate widespread cyber-security risks.
The paper tackles the problem of online password guessing attacks by introducing DALock, a distribution-aware lockout mechanism that reduces attacker success rates to 0.05% while lowering unwanted lockouts for honest users to 0.08%, compared to traditional methods.
Large-scale online password guessing attacks are wide-spread and continuously qualified as one of the top cyber-security risks. The common method for mitigating the risk of online cracking is to lock out the user after a fixed number ($K$) of consecutive incorrect login attempts. Selecting the value of $K$ induces a classic security-usability trade-off. When $K$ is too large a hacker can (quickly) break into a significant fraction of user accounts, but when $K$ is too low we will start to annoy honest users by locking them out after a few mistakes. Motivated by the observation that honest user mistakes typically look quite different than the password guesses of an online attacker, we introduce DALock a {\em distribution aware} password lockout mechanism to reduce user annoyance while minimizing user risk. As the name suggests, DALock is designed to be aware of the frequency and popularity of the password used for login attacks while standard throttling mechanisms (e.g., $K$-strikes) are oblivious to the password distribution. In particular, DALock maintains an extra "hit count" in addition to "strike count" for each user which is based on (estimates of) the cumulative probability of {\em all} login attempts for that particular account. We empirically evaluate DALock with an extensive battery of simulations using real world password datasets. In comparison with the traditional $K$-strikes mechanism we find that DALock offers a superior security/usability trade-off. For example, in one of our simulations we are able to reduce the success rate of an attacker to $0.05\%$ (compared to $1\%$ for the $10$-strikes mechanism) whilst simultaneously reducing the unwanted lockout rate for accounts that are not under attack to just $0.08\%$ (compared to $4\%$ for the $3$-strikes mechanism).