LGCVMLMay 27, 2020

On Mutual Information in Contrastive Learning for Visual Representations

arXiv:2005.13149v293 citations
AI Analysis

This work provides a unifying framework for contrastive learning, which is significant for researchers in unsupervised representation learning, though it is incremental in refining existing methods.

The paper tackles the problem of understanding and improving contrastive learning for visual representations by showing that these algorithms maximize a lower bound on mutual information between image views, and it introduces a new objective that outperforms previous methods in tasks like classification and detection with concrete gains.

In recent years, several unsupervised, "contrastive" learning algorithms in vision have been shown to learn representations that perform remarkably well on transfer tasks. We show that this family of algorithms maximizes a lower bound on the mutual information between two or more "views" of an image where typical views come from a composition of image augmentations. Our bound generalizes the InfoNCE objective to support negative sampling from a restricted region of "difficult" contrasts. We find that the choice of negative samples and views are critical to the success of these algorithms. Reformulating previous learning objectives in terms of mutual information also simplifies and stabilizes them. In practice, our new objectives yield representations that outperform those learned with previous approaches for transfer to classification, bounding box detection, instance segmentation, and keypoint detection. % experiments show that choosing more difficult negative samples results in a stronger representation, outperforming those learned with IR, LA, and CMC in classification, bounding box detection, instance segmentation, and keypoint detection. The mutual information framework provides a unifying comparison of approaches to contrastive learning and uncovers the choices that impact representation learning.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes