Evaluation of CNN-based Automatic Music Tagging Models
This work addresses the need for standardized benchmarks in music information retrieval, though it is incremental as it focuses on evaluation rather than proposing new methods.
The paper tackled the problem of inconsistent evaluation in automatic music tagging by conducting a consistent comparison of CNN-based models across three datasets, providing reference results with common metrics and assessing generalization through input perturbations.
Recent advances in deep learning accelerated the development of content-based automatic music tagging systems. Music information retrieval (MIR) researchers proposed various architecture designs, mainly based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that achieve state-of-the-art results in this multi-label binary classification task. However, due to the differences in experimental setups followed by researchers, such as using different dataset splits and software versions for evaluation, it is difficult to compare the proposed architectures directly with each other. To facilitate further research, in this paper we conduct a consistent evaluation of different music tagging models on three datasets (MagnaTagATune, Million Song Dataset, and MTG-Jamendo) and provide reference results using common evaluation metrics (ROC-AUC and PR-AUC). Furthermore, all the models are evaluated with perturbed inputs to investigate the generalization capabilities concerning time stretch, pitch shift, dynamic range compression, and addition of white noise. For reproducibility, we provide the PyTorch implementations with the pre-trained models.