LGDATA-ANMLMay 17, 2020

Insights into Performance Fitness and Error Metrics for Machine Learning

arXiv:2006.00887v1401 citationsHas Code
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

It provides a review of existing metrics for evaluating ML models, which is incremental and primarily relevant to practitioners in engineering domains.

This paper examines commonly-used performance fitness and error metrics for regression and classification algorithms in machine learning, focusing on engineering applications, without presenting new methods or results.

Machine learning (ML) is the field of training machines to achieve high level of cognition and perform human-like analysis. Since ML is a data-driven approach, it seemingly fits into our daily lives and operations as well as complex and interdisciplinary fields. With the rise of commercial, open-source and user-catered ML tools, a key question often arises whenever ML is applied to explore a phenomenon or a scenario: what constitutes a good ML model? Keeping in mind that a proper answer to this question depends on a variety of factors, this work presumes that a good ML model is one that optimally performs and best describes the phenomenon on hand. From this perspective, identifying proper assessment metrics to evaluate performance of ML models is not only necessary but is also warranted. As such, this paper examines a number of the most commonly-used performance fitness and error metrics for regression and classification algorithms, with emphasis on engineering applications.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes