Double Double Descent: On Generalization Errors in Transfer Learning between Linear Regression Tasks
This work addresses the fragility and conditions for beneficial transfer learning in overparameterized linear regression, which is incremental for machine learning practitioners.
The paper analyzes generalization errors in transfer learning between linear regression tasks, showing that the error follows a two-dimensional double descent pattern controlled by factors like parameter count and task relation, and identifies specific conditions where parameter transfer can substitute for extra overparameterization.
We study the transfer learning process between two linear regression problems. An important and timely special case is when the regressors are overparameterized and perfectly interpolate their training data. We examine a parameter transfer mechanism whereby a subset of the parameters of the target task solution are constrained to the values learned for a related source task. We analytically characterize the generalization error of the target task in terms of the salient factors in the transfer learning architecture, i.e., the number of examples available, the number of (free) parameters in each of the tasks, the number of parameters transferred from the source to target task, and the relation between the two tasks. Our non-asymptotic analysis shows that the generalization error of the target task follows a two-dimensional double descent trend (with respect to the number of free parameters in each of the tasks) that is controlled by the transfer learning factors. Our analysis points to specific cases where the transfer of parameters is beneficial as a substitute for extra overparameterization (i.e., additional free parameters in the target task). Specifically, we show that the usefulness of a transfer learning setting is fragile and depends on a delicate interplay among the set of transferred parameters, the relation between the tasks, and the true solution. We also demonstrate that overparameterized transfer learning is not necessarily more beneficial when the source task is closer or identical to the target task.