On the Global Optimality of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
This provides theoretical justification for MAML's empirical success, addressing a foundational problem in meta-learning for researchers and practitioners.
The paper tackles the theoretical gap in understanding the global optimality of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) by characterizing the optimality gap of its stationary points for reinforcement and supervised learning, establishing global optimality for nonconvex meta-objectives for the first time.
Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) formulates meta-learning as a bilevel optimization problem, where the inner level solves each subtask based on a shared prior, while the outer level searches for the optimal shared prior by optimizing its aggregated performance over all the subtasks. Despite its empirical success, MAML remains less understood in theory, especially in terms of its global optimality, due to the nonconvexity of the meta-objective (the outer-level objective). To bridge such a gap between theory and practice, we characterize the optimality gap of the stationary points attained by MAML for both reinforcement learning and supervised learning, where the inner-level and outer-level problems are solved via first-order optimization methods. In particular, our characterization connects the optimality gap of such stationary points with (i) the functional geometry of inner-level objectives and (ii) the representation power of function approximators, including linear models and neural networks. To the best of our knowledge, our analysis establishes the global optimality of MAML with nonconvex meta-objectives for the first time.