HEP-EXCVINS-DETJun 26, 2020

Point Proposal Network for Reconstructing 3D Particle Endpoints with Sub-Pixel Precision in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers

arXiv:2006.14745v311 citations
AI Analysis

This work addresses a crucial step for particle identification and physics signal inference in neutrino experiments, but it is incremental as it builds on existing methods for point detection in LArTPC data.

The paper tackles the problem of identifying initial and terminal points of particle trajectories in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers (LArTPC) images with sub-pixel precision, achieving a median distance of 0.25 voxels for predicted points within 3 voxels of true locations and high clustering metrics (e.g., 96% efficiency).

Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers (LArTPC) are particle imaging detectors recording 2D or 3D images of trajectories of charged particles. Identifying points of interest in these images, namely the initial and terminal points of track-like particle trajectories such as muons and protons, and the initial points of electromagnetic shower-like particle trajectories such as electrons and gamma rays, is a crucial step of identifying and analyzing these particles and impacts the inference of physics signals such as neutrino interaction. The Point Proposal Network is designed to discover these specific points of interest. The algorithm predicts with a sub-voxel precision their spatial location, and also determines the category of the identified points of interest. Using as a benchmark the PILArNet public LArTPC data sample in which the voxel resolution is 3mm/voxel, our algorithm successfully predicted 96.8% and 97.8% of 3D points within a distance of 3 and 10~voxels from the provided true point locations respectively. For the predicted 3D points within 3 voxels of the closest true point locations, the median distance is found to be 0.25 voxels, achieving the sub-voxel level precision. In addition, we report our analysis of the mistakes where our algorithm prediction differs from the provided true point positions by more than 10~voxels. Among 50 mistakes visually scanned, 25 were due to the definition of true position location, 15 were legitimate mistakes where a physicist cannot visually disagree with the algorithm's prediction, and 10 were genuine mistakes that we wish to improve in the future. Further, using these predicted points, we demonstrate a simple algorithm to cluster 3D voxels into individual track-like particle trajectories with a clustering efficiency, purity, and Adjusted Rand Index of 96%, 93%, and 91% respectively.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes