LGMLJun 28, 2020

Causal Explanations of Image Misclassifications

arXiv:2006.15739v1
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses model interpretability and accuracy for image classification, but is incremental as it builds on existing methods for misclassification analysis.

The study tackled the problem of image misclassifications by analyzing patterns across six CNN architectures on CIFAR-10, identifying two causes: morphological similarity and non-essential information interference, and reduced misclassifications by erasing pixels in saliency map-based bounding boxes.

The causal explanation of image misclassifications is an understudied niche, which can potentially provide valuable insights in model interpretability and increase prediction accuracy. This study trains CIFAR-10 on six modern CNN architectures, including VGG16, ResNet50, GoogLeNet, DenseNet161, MobileNet V2, and Inception V3, and explores the misclassification patterns using conditional confusion matrices and misclassification networks. Two causes are identified and qualitatively distinguished: morphological similarity and non-essential information interference. The former cause is not model dependent, whereas the latter is inconsistent across all six models. To reduce the misclassifications caused by non-essential information interference, this study erases the pixels within the bonding boxes anchored at the top 5% pixels of the saliency map. This method first verifies the cause; then by directly modifying the cause it reduces the misclassification. Future studies will focus on quantitatively differentiating the two causes of misclassifications, generalizing the anchor-box based inference modification method to reduce misclassification, exploring the interactions of the two causes in misclassifications.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes