MLLGJun 29, 2020

VAE-KRnet and its applications to variational Bayes

arXiv:2006.16431v214 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses density estimation and variational inference problems for researchers in machine learning, offering an incremental improvement over existing methods like VAE and mean-field approximations.

The authors tackled the challenge of high-dimensional density estimation and variational Bayes by proposing VAE-KRnet, a model combining VAE with KRnet for improved effectiveness and robustness, showing it can better approximate distributions and enhance variance estimation in variational Bayes.

In this work, we have proposed a generative model, called VAE-KRnet, for density estimation or approximation, which combines the canonical variational autoencoder (VAE) with our recently developed flow-based generative model, called KRnet. VAE is used as a dimension reduction technique to capture the latent space, and KRnet is used to model the distribution of the latent variable. Using a linear model between the data and the latent variable, we show that VAE-KRnet can be more effective and robust than the canonical VAE. VAE-KRnet can be used as a density model to approximate either data distribution or an arbitrary probability density function (PDF) known up to a constant. VAE-KRnet is flexible in terms of dimensionality. When the number of dimensions is relatively small, KRnet can effectively approximate the distribution in terms of the original random variable. For high-dimensional cases, we may use VAE-KRnet to incorporate dimension reduction. One important application of VAE-KRnet is the variational Bayes for the approximation of the posterior distribution. The variational Bayes approaches are usually based on the minimization of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the model and the posterior. For high-dimensional distributions, it is very challenging to construct an accurate density model due to the curse of dimensionality, where extra assumptions are often introduced for efficiency. For instance, the classical mean-field approach assumes mutual independence between dimensions, which often yields an underestimated variance due to oversimplification. To alleviate this issue, we include into the loss the maximization of the mutual information between the latent random variable and the original random variable, which helps keep more information from the region of low density such that the estimation of variance is improved.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes