CVJul 14, 2020

Re-ranking for Writer Identification and Writer Retrieval

arXiv:2007.07101v112 citations
AI Analysis

This work addresses writer identification for document analysis, but it is incremental as it applies existing re-ranking techniques to a new domain.

The paper tackled the problem of writer identification and retrieval by introducing a re-ranking step based on k-reciprocal nearest neighbor relationships, which improved mean average precision (mAP) on three datasets, even with few samples per writer.

Automatic writer identification is a common problem in document analysis. State-of-the-art methods typically focus on the feature extraction step with traditional or deep-learning-based techniques. In retrieval problems, re-ranking is a commonly used technique to improve the results. Re-ranking refines an initial ranking result by using the knowledge contained in the ranked result, e. g., by exploiting nearest neighbor relations. To the best of our knowledge, re-ranking has not been used for writer identification/retrieval. A possible reason might be that publicly available benchmark datasets contain only few samples per writer which makes a re-ranking less promising. We show that a re-ranking step based on k-reciprocal nearest neighbor relationships is advantageous for writer identification, even if only a few samples per writer are available. We use these reciprocal relationships in two ways: encode them into new vectors, as originally proposed, or integrate them in terms of query-expansion. We show that both techniques outperform the baseline results in terms of mAP on three writer identification datasets.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes