CLIRJul 20, 2020

Frustratingly Hard Evidence Retrieval for QA Over Books

arXiv:2007.09878v131.11002 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of evidence retrieval for QA over books, which is an incremental improvement in a domain-specific area.

The paper tackles the problem of question answering over narrative books by formulating it as an open-domain QA task and investigates state-of-the-art approaches, achieving state-of-the-art results on the NarrativeQA benchmark while revealing the difficulty of evidence retrieval in books through experiments and analysis.

A lot of progress has been made to improve question answering (QA) in recent years, but the special problem of QA over narrative book stories has not been explored in-depth. We formulate BookQA as an open-domain QA task given its similar dependency on evidence retrieval. We further investigate how state-of-the-art open-domain QA approaches can help BookQA. Besides achieving state-of-the-art on the NarrativeQA benchmark, our study also reveals the difficulty of evidence retrieval in books with a wealth of experiments and analysis - which necessitates future effort on novel solutions for evidence retrieval in BookQA.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes