CLAug 7, 2020

Learning a natural-language to LTL executable semantic parser for grounded robotics

arXiv:2008.03277v351 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This enables robots to learn language from context without extensive annotations, addressing a key challenge in human-robot interaction, though it is incremental as it builds on existing semantic parsing and LTL planning methods.

The paper tackles the problem of training robots to understand and execute natural language commands with temporal aspects by developing a grounded semantic parser that discovers latent linguistic representations using Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), achieving near-equal accuracy on both machine-generated and human-generated commands despite the latter's greater complexity and open lexicon.

Children acquire their native language with apparent ease by observing how language is used in context and attempting to use it themselves. They do so without laborious annotations, negative examples, or even direct corrections. We take a step toward robots that can do the same by training a grounded semantic parser, which discovers latent linguistic representations that can be used for the execution of natural-language commands. In particular, we focus on the difficult domain of commands with a temporal aspect, whose semantics we capture with Linear Temporal Logic, LTL. Our parser is trained with pairs of sentences and executions as well as an executor. At training time, the parser hypothesizes a meaning representation for the input as a formula in LTL. Three competing pressures allow the parser to discover meaning from language. First, any hypothesized meaning for a sentence must be permissive enough to reflect all the annotated execution trajectories. Second, the executor -- a pretrained end-to-end LTL planner -- must find that the observe trajectories are likely executions of the meaning. Finally, a generator, which reconstructs the original input, encourages the model to find representations that conserve knowledge about the command. Together these ensure that the meaning is neither too general nor too specific. Our model generalizes well, being able to parse and execute both machine-generated and human-generated commands, with near-equal accuracy, despite the fact that the human-generated sentences are much more varied and complex with an open lexicon. The approach presented here is not specific to LTL: it can be applied to any domain where sentence meanings can be hypothesized and an executor can verify these meanings, thus opening the door to many applications for robotic agents.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes