Road Segmentation for Remote Sensing Images using Adversarial Spatial Pyramid Networks
This addresses the problem of accurate road extraction for applications like urban planning and navigation, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing GAN and feature pyramid methods.
The paper tackles road segmentation in remote sensing images by introducing a model that combines adversarial networks with a feature pyramid for domain adaptation and multi-scale feature extraction, achieving state-of-the-art 78.86 IOU on the Massachusetts dataset with 4x fewer FLOPs and 3.47% higher accuracy than top performers.
Road extraction in remote sensing images is of great importance for a wide range of applications. Because of the complex background, and high density, most of the existing methods fail to accurately extract a road network that appears correct and complete. Moreover, they suffer from either insufficient training data or high costs of manual annotation. To address these problems, we introduce a new model to apply structured domain adaption for synthetic image generation and road segmentation. We incorporate a feature pyramid network into generative adversarial networks to minimize the difference between the source and target domains. A generator is learned to produce quality synthetic images, and the discriminator attempts to distinguish them. We also propose a feature pyramid network that improves the performance of the proposed model by extracting effective features from all the layers of the network for describing different scales objects. Indeed, a novel scale-wise architecture is introduced to learn from the multi-level feature maps and improve the semantics of the features. For optimization, the model is trained by a joint reconstruction loss function, which minimizes the difference between the fake images and the real ones. A wide range of experiments on three datasets prove the superior performance of the proposed approach in terms of accuracy and efficiency. In particular, our model achieves state-of-the-art 78.86 IOU on the Massachusetts dataset with 14.89M parameters and 86.78B FLOPs, with 4x fewer FLOPs but higher accuracy (+3.47% IOU) than the top performer among state-of-the-art approaches used in the evaluation.