Ice Monitoring in Swiss Lakes from Optical Satellites and Webcams using Machine Learning
This work addresses the need for operational monitoring of lake ice as an Essential Climate Variable, providing a tool for climate scientists and environmental agencies, though it is incremental in applying existing segmentation methods to new data sources.
The paper tackles the problem of monitoring lake ice cover in Swiss Alpine lakes using machine learning for pixel-wise semantic segmentation from optical satellite images and webcam streams, achieving mean Intersection-over-Union scores >93% for satellite-based methods and approximately 87% for webcam-based approaches.
Continuous observation of climate indicators, such as trends in lake freezing, is important to understand the dynamics of the local and global climate system. Consequently, lake ice has been included among the Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) of the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), and there is a need to set up operational monitoring capabilities. Multi-temporal satellite images and publicly available webcam streams are among the viable data sources to monitor lake ice. In this work we investigate machine learning-based image analysis as a tool to determine the spatio-temporal extent of ice on Swiss Alpine lakes as well as the ice-on and ice-off dates, from both multispectral optical satellite images (VIIRS and MODIS) and RGB webcam images. We model lake ice monitoring as a pixel-wise semantic segmentation problem, i.e., each pixel on the lake surface is classified to obtain a spatially explicit map of ice cover. We show experimentally that the proposed system produces consistently good results when tested on data from multiple winters and lakes. Our satellite-based method obtains mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) scores >93%, for both sensors. It also generalises well across lakes and winters with mIoU scores >78% and >80% respectively. On average, our webcam approach achieves mIoU values of 87% (approx.) and generalisation scores of 71% (approx.) and 69% (approx.) across different cameras and winters respectively. Additionally, we put forward a new benchmark dataset of webcam images (Photi-LakeIce) which includes data from two winters and three cameras.