LGCVNEDec 8, 2020

Reinforcement Based Learning on Classification Task Could Yield Better Generalization and Adversarial Accuracy

arXiv:2012.04353v11 citations
AI Analysis

This work addresses the vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial examples and poor generalization for the deep learning community, offering an incremental improvement.

This paper proposes a novel method to train deep learning models for image classification using a reward-based optimization function, similar to policy gradient, instead of cross-entropy loss. Empirical evaluation on CIFAR-10 shows that this method yields a more robust classifier against adversarial examples and achieves better generalization, with a train-test accuracy difference of less than 2% compared to over 2% for cross-entropy.

Deep Learning has become interestingly popular in computer vision, mostly attaining near or above human-level performance in various vision tasks. But recent work has also demonstrated that these deep neural networks are very vulnerable to adversarial examples (adversarial examples - inputs to a model which are naturally similar to original data but fools the model in classifying it into a wrong class). Humans are very robust against such perturbations; one possible reason could be that humans do not learn to classify based on an error between "target label" and "predicted label" but possibly due to reinforcements that they receive on their predictions. In this work, we proposed a novel method to train deep learning models on an image classification task. We used a reward-based optimization function, similar to the vanilla policy gradient method used in reinforcement learning, to train our model instead of conventional cross-entropy loss. An empirical evaluation on the cifar10 dataset showed that our method learns a more robust classifier than the same model architecture trained using cross-entropy loss function (on adversarial training). At the same time, our method shows a better generalization with the difference in test accuracy and train accuracy $< 2\%$ for most of the time compared to the cross-entropy one, whose difference most of the time remains $> 2\%$.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes