HCDec 30, 2020

The Challenges of Crowd Workers in Rural and Urban America

arXiv:2012.15211v121 citations
AI Analysis

This research identifies specific challenges and success factors for crowd workers in rural and urban U.S. regions, providing insights for platform designers to create more inclusive crowd work opportunities for economically disadvantaged areas.

This paper investigates the challenges and advantages of rural and super rural Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowd workers compared to urban workers. Based on a survey of 421 U.S. crowd workers, it found that rural workers, despite facing onboarding inequalities, tended to perform better in micro-tasking than their urban counterparts.

Crowd work has the potential of helping the financial recovery of regions traditionally plagued by a lack of economic opportunities, e.g., rural areas. However, we currently have limited information about the challenges facing crowd work-ers from rural and super rural areas as they struggle to make a living through crowd work sites. This paper examines the challenges and advantages of rural and super rural AmazonMechanical Turk (MTurk) crowd workers and contrasts them with those of workers from urban areas. Based on a survey of421 crowd workers from differing geographic regions in theU.S., we identified how across regions, people struggled with being onboarded into crowd work. We uncovered that despite the inequalities and barriers, rural workers tended to be striving more in micro-tasking than their urban counterparts. We also identified cultural traits, relating to time dimension and individualism, that offer us an insight into crowd workers and the necessary qualities for them to succeed on gig platforms. We finish by providing design implications based on our findings to create more inclusive crowd work platforms and tools

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes