Discussing the Risks of Adaptive Virtual Environments for User Autonomy
This paper highlights the ethical risks of adaptive virtual environments for users, specifically concerning their autonomy and potential manipulation by institutions. It is an incremental contribution to the ongoing discussion about AI ethics.
This paper discusses the risks of adaptive virtual environments, arguing that while they can enhance user experience, they also pose a threat to user autonomy by allowing companies or governments to precisely control personal opinions. The authors examine two use cases in professional work and personalized content to illustrate potential abusive uses.
Adaptive virtual environments are an opportunity to support users and increase their flow, presence, immersion, and overall experience. Possible fields of application are adaptive individual education, gameplay adjustment, professional work, and personalized content. But who benefits more from this adaptivity, the users who can enjoy a greater user experience or the companies or governments who are completely in control of the provided content. While the user autonomy decreases for individuals, the power of institutions raises, and the risk exists that personal opinions are precisely controlled. In this position paper, we will argue that researchers should not only propose the benefits of their work but also critically discuss what are possible abusive use cases. Therefore, we will examine two use cases in the fields of professional work and personalized content and show possible abusive use.