A note on the price of bandit feedback for mistake-bounded online learning
This work addresses a theoretical gap in online learning theory by correcting an error in a foundational result, which is incremental but necessary for the field's rigor.
The paper identifies and corrects a false lemma in a prior claim about the price of bandit feedback in online multiclass classification, showing that the lemma fails when vectors are multiples modulo a prime, and provides a fix to restore the original result's proof.
The standard model and the bandit model are two generalizations of the mistake-bound model to online multiclass classification. In both models the learner guesses a classification in each round, but in the standard model the learner recieves the correct classification after each guess, while in the bandit model the learner is only told whether or not their guess is correct in each round. For any set $F$ of multiclass classifiers, define $opt_{std}(F)$ and $opt_{bandit}(F)$ to be the optimal worst-case number of prediction mistakes in the standard and bandit models respectively. Long (Theoretical Computer Science, 2020) claimed that for all $M > 2$ and infinitely many $k$, there exists a set $F$ of functions from a set $X$ to a set $Y$ of size $k$ such that $opt_{std}(F) = M$ and $opt_{bandit}(F) \ge (1 - o(1))(|Y|\ln{|Y|})opt_{std}(F)$. The proof of this result depended on the following lemma, which is false e.g. for all prime $p \ge 5$, $s = \mathbf{1}$ (the all $1$ vector), $t = \mathbf{2}$ (the all $2$ vector), and all $z$. Lemma: Fix $n \ge 2$ and prime $p$, and let $u$ be chosen uniformly at random from $\left\{0, \dots, p-1\right\}^n$. For any $s, t \in \left\{1, \dots, p-1\right\}^n$ with $s \neq t$ and for any $z \in \left\{0, \dots, p-1\right\}$, we have $\Pr(t \cdot u = z \mod p \text{ } | \text{ } s \cdot u = z \mod p) = \frac{1}{p}$. We show that this lemma is false precisely when $s$ and $t$ are multiples of each other mod $p$. Then using a new lemma, we fix Long's proof.