HCJan 20, 2021

Towards the Right Direction in BiDirectional User Interfaces

arXiv:2101.08070v214 citations
AI Analysis

This addresses a usability issue for hundreds of millions of BiDi language speakers, but it is incremental as it builds on existing guidelines with new empirical evidence.

The paper tackled the problem of inconsistent and incorrect directionality in bidirectional (BiDi) user interfaces, which can cause confusion and errors for users of languages like Arabic and Hebrew, by reviewing websites and surveying 234 BiDi speakers, finding that user preferences often conflicted with existing guidelines.

Hundreds of millions of speakers of bidirectional (BiDi) languages rely on writing systems that mix the native right-to-left script with left-to-right strings. The global reach of interactive digital technologies requires special attention to these people, whose perception of interfaces is affected by this script mixture. However, empirical research on this topic is scarce. Although leading software vendors provide guidelines for BiDi design, bidirectional interfaces demonstrate inconsistent and incorrect directionality of UI elements, which may cause user confusion and errors. Through a websites' review, we identified problematic UI items and considered reasons for their existence. In an online survey with 234 BiDi speakers, we observed that in many cases, users' direction preferences were inconsistent with the guidelines. The findings provide potential insights for design rules and empirical evidence for the problem's complexity, suggesting the need for further empirical research and greater attention by the HCI community to the BiDi design problem.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes