CRITJan 27, 2021

Equivalence of Non-Perfect Secret Sharing and Symmetric Private Information Retrieval with General Access Structure

arXiv:2101.11194v3
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses foundational problems in cryptography and information theory by linking two key protocols, with incremental contributions to theoretical understanding.

The paper tackles the problem of establishing equivalence between non-perfect secret sharing (NSS) and symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) with general access structures, proving that given any SPIR protocol, an NSS protocol can be constructed with the same rate, and vice versa for linear protocols, leading to an upper bound on SPIR capacity, specifically showing it is (r-t)/n for n-server SPIR with r responsive and t colluding servers.

We study the equivalence between non-perfect secret sharing (NSS) and symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) with arbitrary response and collusion patterns. NSS and SPIR are defined with an access structure, which corresponds to the authorized/forbidden sets for NSS and the response/collusion patterns for SPIR. We prove the equivalence between NSS and SPIR in the following two senses. 1) Given any SPIR protocol with an access structure, an NSS protocol is constructed with the same access structure and the same rate. 2) Given any linear NSS protocol with an access structure, a linear SPIR protocol is constructed with the same access structure and the same rate. We prove the first relation even if the SPIR protocol has imperfect correctness and secrecy. From the first relation, we derive an upper bound of the SPIR capacity for arbitrary response and collusion patterns. For the special case of $\mathsf{n}$-server SPIR with $\mathsf{r}$ responsive and $\mathsf{t}$ colluding servers, this upper bound proves that the SPIR capacity is $(\mathsf{r}-\mathsf{t})/\mathsf{n}$. From the second relation, we prove that a SPIR protocol exists for any response and collusion patterns.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes