A Note on Argumentative Topology: Circularity and Syllogisms as Unsolved Problems
This work highlights a fundamental limitation for researchers attempting to use topological methods to analyze the logical structure of text.
This paper re-examines a recent attempt to apply topological data analysis to natural language inference, specifically focusing on the ability to capture "logical shape in text" using topological delay embeddings. Through several examples, the authors demonstrate that this approach fails to identify circularity in arguments, indicating that the problem of connecting logic, topology, and text remains unsolved.
In the last couple of years there were a few attempts to apply topological data analysis to text, and in particular to natural language inference. A recent work by Tymochko et al. suggests the possibility of capturing `the notion of logical shape in text,' using `topological delay embeddings,' a technique derived from dynamical systems, applied to word embeddings. In this note we reconstruct their argument and show, using several old and new examples, that the problem of connecting logic, topology and text is still very much unsolved. We conclude that there is no clear answer to the question: ``Can we find a circle in a circular argument?'' We point out some possible avenues of exploration. The code used in our experiment is also shown.