PREPRINT: Comparison of deep learning and hand crafted features for mining simulation data
This work addresses the challenge of interpreting complex CFD data for industrial applications like aerodynamic optimization, though it is incremental as it applies existing methods to a new domain.
The paper tackled the problem of automatically analyzing high-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation data, such as flow fields around airfoils, by comparing deep learning methods and hand-crafted features for tasks like predicting drag and lift forces, and found both approaches accurately described the data on a dataset of 16,000 flow fields.
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are a very important tool for many industrial applications, such as aerodynamic optimization of engineering designs like cars shapes, airplanes parts etc. The output of such simulations, in particular the calculated flow fields, are usually very complex and hard to interpret for realistic three-dimensional real-world applications, especially if time-dependent simulations are investigated. Automated data analysis methods are warranted but a non-trivial obstacle is given by the very large dimensionality of the data. A flow field typically consists of six measurement values for each point of the computational grid in 3D space and time (velocity vector values, turbulent kinetic energy, pressure and viscosity). In this paper we address the task of extracting meaningful results in an automated manner from such high dimensional data sets. We propose deep learning methods which are capable of processing such data and which can be trained to solve relevant tasks on simulation data, i.e. predicting drag and lift forces applied on an airfoil. We also propose an adaptation of the classical hand crafted features known from computer vision to address the same problem and compare a large variety of descriptors and detectors. Finally, we compile a large dataset of 2D simulations of the flow field around airfoils which contains 16000 flow fields with which we tested and compared approaches. Our results show that the deep learning-based methods, as well as hand crafted feature based approaches, are well-capable to accurately describe the content of the CFD simulation output on the proposed dataset.