CVCLMar 23, 2021

Multi-Modal Answer Validation for Knowledge-Based VQA

arXiv:2103.12248v3185 citationsHas Code
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

It addresses the problem of handling irrelevant facts from multiple knowledge sources for researchers in multi-modal AI, representing an incremental improvement with a novel method for a known bottleneck.

The paper tackles the challenge of noisy external knowledge in knowledge-based visual question answering by proposing MAVEx, which validates answer candidates using answer-specific knowledge retrieval, achieving new state-of-the-art results on the OK-VQA dataset.

The problem of knowledge-based visual question answering involves answering questions that require external knowledge in addition to the content of the image. Such knowledge typically comes in various forms, including visual, textual, and commonsense knowledge. Using more knowledge sources increases the chance of retrieving more irrelevant or noisy facts, making it challenging to comprehend the facts and find the answer. To address this challenge, we propose Multi-modal Answer Validation using External knowledge (MAVEx), where the idea is to validate a set of promising answer candidates based on answer-specific knowledge retrieval. Instead of searching for the answer in a vast collection of often irrelevant facts as most existing approaches do, MAVEx aims to learn how to extract relevant knowledge from noisy sources, which knowledge source to trust for each answer candidate, and how to validate the candidate using that source. Our multi-modal setting is the first to leverage external visual knowledge (images searched using Google), in addition to textual knowledge in the form of Wikipedia sentences and ConceptNet concepts. Our experiments with OK-VQA, a challenging knowledge-based VQA dataset, demonstrate that MAVEx achieves new state-of-the-art results. Our code is available at https://github.com/jialinwu17/MAVEX

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes