Memory Capacity of Recurrent Neural Networks with Matrix Representation
This work addresses memory issues in RNNs for machine learning applications, but it is incremental as it builds on existing Neural Turing Machine frameworks with matrix representations.
The paper tackles the memory capacity limitations of recurrent neural networks by analyzing matrix-based RNNs and introducing Matrix Neural Turing Machines, showing that memory capacity scales with N^2 for N×N state matrices and demonstrating improved performance in algorithmic tasks like copying and recall.
It is well known that canonical recurrent neural networks (RNNs) face limitations in learning long-term dependencies which have been addressed by memory structures in long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Neural Turing machines (NTMs) are novel RNNs that implement the notion of programmable computers with neural network controllers that can learn simple algorithmic tasks. Matrix neural networks feature matrix representation which inherently preserves the spatial structure of data when compared to canonical neural networks that use vector-based representation. One may then argue that neural networks with matrix representations may have the potential to provide better memory capacity. In this paper, we define and study a probabilistic notion of memory capacity based on Fisher information for matrix-based RNNs. We find bounds on memory capacity for such networks under various hypotheses and compare them with their vector counterparts. In particular, we show that the memory capacity of such networks is bounded by $N^2$ for $N\times N$ state matrix which generalizes the one known for vector networks. We also show and analyze the increase in memory capacity for such networks which is introduced when one exhibits an external state memory, such as NTMs. Consequently, we construct NTMs with RNN controllers with matrix-based representation of external memory, leading us to introduce Matrix NTMs. We demonstrate the performance of this class of memory networks under certain algorithmic learning tasks such as copying and recall and compare it with Matrix RNNs. We find an improvement in the performance of Matrix NTMs by the addition of external memory, in comparison to Matrix RNNs.