Towards Accountability in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Public Administrations
This addresses accountability issues for public administrations using AI, but it is incremental as it builds on existing philosophical and regulatory frameworks.
The paper tackles the problem of imperfect delegation in AI systems used by public administrations, which challenges human accountability, and finds that current guidelines lack clarity on auditors' entitlements and auditing goals.
We argue that the phenomena of distributed responsibility, induced acceptance, and acceptance through ignorance constitute instances of imperfect delegation when tasks are delegated to computationally-driven systems. Imperfect delegation challenges human accountability. We hold that both direct public accountability via public transparency and indirect public accountability via transparency to auditors in public organizations can be both instrumentally ethically valuable and required as a matter of deontology from the principle of democratic self-government. We analyze the regulatory content of 16 guideline documents about the use of AI in the public sector, by mapping their requirements to those of our philosophical account of accountability, and conclude that while some guidelines refer to processes that amount to auditing, it seems that the debate would benefit from more clarity about the nature of the entitlement of auditors and the goals of auditing, also in order to develop ethically meaningful standards with respect to which different forms of auditing can be evaluated and compared.