CYLGApr 30, 2021

Does "AI" stand for augmenting inequality in the era of covid-19 healthcare?

arXiv:2105.07844v1191 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

It addresses the risk of AI amplifying health inequities for vulnerable populations during a global crisis, highlighting a critical ethical issue rather than proposing a technical solution.

The paper examines how AI technologies in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic can exacerbate existing inequalities by introducing biases in datasets, data representativeness, and human design choices, potentially worsening health outcomes for disadvantaged groups.

Among the most damaging characteristics of the covid-19 pandemic has been its disproportionate effect on disadvantaged communities. As the outbreak has spread globally, factors such as systemic racism, marginalisation, and structural inequality have created path dependencies that have led to poor health outcomes. These social determinants of infectious disease and vulnerability to disaster have converged to affect already disadvantaged communities with higher levels of economic instability, disease exposure, infection severity, and death. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are an important part of the health informatics toolkit used to fight contagious disease. AI is well known, however, to be susceptible to algorithmic biases that can entrench and augment existing inequality. Uncritically deploying AI in the fight against covid-19 thus risks amplifying the pandemic's adverse effects on vulnerable groups, exacerbating health inequity. In this paper, we claim that AI systems can introduce or reflect bias and discrimination in three ways: in patterns of health discrimination that become entrenched in datasets, in data representativeness, and in human choices made during the design, development, and deployment of these systems. We highlight how the use of AI technologies threaten to exacerbate the disparate effect of covid-19 on marginalised, under-represented, and vulnerable groups, particularly black, Asian, and other minoritised ethnic people, older populations, and those of lower socioeconomic status. We conclude that, to mitigate the compounding effects of AI on inequalities associated with covid-19, decision makers, technology developers, and health officials must account for the potential biases and inequities at all stages of the AI process.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes