AO-PHLGMay 18, 2021

A LightGBM based Forecasting of Dominant Wave Periods in Oceanic Waters

arXiv:2105.08721v49 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses wave period forecasting for oceanic monitoring and safety, but it is incremental as it applies existing machine learning methods to a specific domain with new data.

The paper tackles the problem of forecasting dominant wave periods in oceanic waters up to 30 days ahead, using LightGBM and Extra Trees with wave and atmospheric features, achieving high R2 scores (e.g., 0.94 for LightGBM) and outperforming numerical models like ECMWF in test datasets.

In this paper, we propose a Light Gradient Boosting (LightGBM) to forecast dominant wave periods in oceanic waters. First, we use the data collected from CDIP buoys and apply various data filtering methods. The data filtering methods allow us to obtain a high-quality dataset for training and validation purposes. We then extract various wave-based features like wave heights, periods, skewness, kurtosis, etc., and atmospheric features like humidity, pressure, and air temperature for the buoys. Afterward, we train algorithms that use LightGBM and Extra Trees through a hv-block cross-validation scheme to forecast dominant wave periods for up to 30 days ahead. LightGBM has the R2 score of 0.94, 0.94, and 0.94 for 1-day ahead, 15-day ahead, and 30-day ahead prediction. Similarly, Extra Trees (ET) has an R2 score of 0.88, 0.86, and 0.85 for 1-day ahead, 15-day ahead, and 30 day ahead prediction. In case of the test dataset, LightGBM has R2 score of 0.94, 0.94, and 0.94 for 1-day ahead, 15-day ahead and 30-day ahead prediction. ET has R2 score of 0.88, 0.86, and 0.85 for 1-day ahead, 15-day ahead, and 30-day ahead prediction. A similar R2 score for both training and the test dataset suggests that the machine learning models developed in this paper are robust. Since the LightGBM algorithm outperforms ET for all the windows tested, it is taken as the final algorithm. Note that the performance of both methods does not decrease significantly as the forecast horizon increases. Likewise, the proposed method outperforms the numerical approaches included in this paper in the test dataset. For 1 day ahead prediction, the proposed algorithm has SI, Bias, CC, and RMSE of 0.09, 0.00, 0.97, and 1.78 compared to 0.268, 0.40, 0.63, and 2.18 for the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model, which outperforms all the other methods in the test dataset.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes