A Computational Model of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
This work provides a computational tool for communities to perform what-if analysis on social rules, though it is incremental as it builds on the existing IAD framework.
The authors tackled the problem of formalizing the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework into a computational model, resulting in the Action Situation Language (ASL) and a game engine that generates extensive-form games for analyzing rule configurations.
The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework is a conceptual toolbox put forward by Elinor Ostrom and colleagues in an effort to identify and delineate the universal common variables that structure the immense variety of human interactions. The framework identifies rules as one of the core concepts to determine the structure of interactions, and acknowledges their potential to steer a community towards more beneficial and socially desirable outcomes. This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a computational model to allow communities of agents to formally perform what-if analysis on a given rule configuration. To do so, we define the Action Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is hgighly tailored to the components of the IAD framework and that we use to write descriptions of social interactions. ASL is complemented by a game engine that generates its semantics as an extensive-form game. These models, then, can be analyzed with the standard tools of game theory to predict which outcomes are being most incentivized, and evaluated according to their socially relevant properties.