Changing the World by Changing the Data
This position paper addresses the problem of biased and unreliable NLP models for researchers and practitioners, but it is incremental as it builds on existing discussions about data curation.
The paper argues that the NLP community should focus more on careful dataset curation to address issues like spurious patterns and biases in models, as algorithmic solutions have had limited success, and it highlights that curation is already happening and shaping the field.
NLP community is currently investing a lot more research and resources into development of deep learning models than training data. While we have made a lot of progress, it is now clear that our models learn all kinds of spurious patterns, social biases, and annotation artifacts. Algorithmic solutions have so far had limited success. An alternative that is being actively discussed is more careful design of datasets so as to deliver specific signals. This position paper maps out the arguments for and against data curation, and argues that fundamentally the point is moot: curation already is and will be happening, and it is changing the world. The question is only how much thought we want to invest into that process.