A weighted unified informetrics based on Scopus and WoS
This addresses the issue of fragmented bibliometric data for researchers and institutions, though it is incremental as it builds on existing databases without fundamentally changing the field.
The paper tackled the problem of inconsistent publication metrics across indexing databases by proposing a weighted unified informetrics system called 'conflate', which integrates data from Scopus and WoS to generate single counts for publications, citations, and h-index, with comparative analysis showing improved consistency at author, organization, and journal levels.
Numerous indexing databases keep track of the number of publications, citations, etc. in order to maintain the progress of science and individual. However, the choice of journals and articles varies among these indexing databases, hence the number of citations and h-index varies. There is no common platform exists that can provide a single count for the number of publications, citations, h-index, etc. To overcome this limitation, we have proposed a weighted unified informetrics, named "conflate". The proposed system takes into account the input from multiple indexing databases and generates a single output. Here, we have used the data from Scopus and WoS to generate a conflate dataset. Further, a comparative analysis of conflate has been performed with Scopus and WoS at three levels: author, organization, and journal. Finally, a mapping is proposed between research publications and distributed ledger technology in order to provide a transparent and distributed view to its stakeholders.