Learning Treatment Effects in Panels with General Intervention Patterns
This addresses a central econometric question for researchers and practitioners by enabling broader applicability of causal inference methods, though it is an incremental extension of existing paradigms.
The paper tackles the problem of estimating average treatment effects in panel data with general intervention patterns, extending the synthetic control framework to allow rate-optimal recovery and showing a substantial advantage over competing estimators in computational experiments.
The problem of causal inference with panel data is a central econometric question. The following is a fundamental version of this problem: Let $M^*$ be a low rank matrix and $E$ be a zero-mean noise matrix. For a `treatment' matrix $Z$ with entries in $\{0,1\}$ we observe the matrix $O$ with entries $O_{ij} := M^*_{ij} + E_{ij} + \mathcal{T}_{ij} Z_{ij}$ where $\mathcal{T}_{ij} $ are unknown, heterogenous treatment effects. The problem requires we estimate the average treatment effect $τ^* := \sum_{ij} \mathcal{T}_{ij} Z_{ij} / \sum_{ij} Z_{ij}$. The synthetic control paradigm provides an approach to estimating $τ^*$ when $Z$ places support on a single row. This paper extends that framework to allow rate-optimal recovery of $τ^*$ for general $Z$, thus broadly expanding its applicability. Our guarantees are the first of their type in this general setting. Computational experiments on synthetic and real-world data show a substantial advantage over competing estimators.