CVJun 13, 2021

Is Perfect Filtering Enough Leading to Perfect Phase Correction for dMRI data?

arXiv:2106.06992v1
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses noise-floor artifacts in diffusion MRI data, which is an incremental improvement for medical imaging researchers.

The authors tackled the problem of noise-floor bias in diffusion MRI by showing that even perfect filtering is insufficient for phase correction due to sign-symbol artifacts, and they proposed a calibration procedure that effectively distinguishes noise sign symbols without external techniques.

Being complex-valued and low in signal-to-noise ratios, magnitude-based diffusion MRI is confounded by the noise-floor that falsely elevates signal magnitude and incurs bias to the commonly used diffusion indices, such as fractional anisotropy (FA). To avoid noise-floor, most existing phase correction methods explore improving filters to estimate the noise-free background phase. In this work, after diving into the phase correction procedures, we argue that even a perfect filter is insufficient for phase correction because the correction procedures are incapable of distinguishing sign-symbols of noise, resulting in artifacts (\textit{i.e.}, arbitrary signal loss). With this insight, we generalize the definition of noise-floor to a complex polar coordinate system and propose a calibration procedure that could conveniently distinguish noise sign symbols. The calibration procedure is conceptually simple and easy to implement without relying on any external technique while keeping distinctly effective.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes