Extractive Explanations for Interpretable Text Ranking
This addresses the need for interpretable AI in ranking tasks, though it is incremental as it builds on existing ranking models.
The paper tackles the problem of non-interpretable neural document ranking models by proposing a Select-and-Rank paradigm that generates explanations as a by-product, and the result is a competitive approach to state-of-the-art methods.
Neural document ranking models perform impressively well due to superior language understanding gained from pre-training tasks. However, due to their complexity and large number of parameters, these (typically transformer-based) models are often non-interpretable in that ranking decisions can not be clearly attributed to specific parts of the input documents. In this paper we propose ranking models that are inherently interpretable by generating explanations as a by-product of the prediction decision. We introduce the Select-and-Rank paradigm for document ranking, where we first output an explanation as a selected subset of sentences in a document. Thereafter, we solely use the explanation or selection to make the prediction, making explanations first-class citizens in the ranking process. Technically, we treat sentence selection as a latent variable trained jointly with the ranker from the final output. To that end, we propose an end-to-end training technique for Select-and-Rank models utilizing reparameterizable subset sampling using the Gumbel-max trick. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate that our approach is competitive to state-of-the-art methods. Our approach is broadly applicable to numerous ranking tasks and furthers the goal of building models that are interpretable by design. Finally, we present real-world applications that benefit from our sentence selection method.