LGCCJul 5, 2021

Memory-Sample Lower Bounds for Learning Parity with Noise

arXiv:2107.02320v116 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses fundamental limitations in learning theory for noisy data, with implications for algorithm design in machine learning, though it is incremental as it adapts prior arguments to the noisy case.

The paper tackles the problem of learning parity under noise by proving that any algorithm requires either memory of size Ω(n²/ε) or an exponential number of samples, and extends this to a broad class of noisy learning problems, showing similar memory-sample trade-offs.

In this work, we show, for the well-studied problem of learning parity under noise, where a learner tries to learn $x=(x_1,\ldots,x_n) \in \{0,1\}^n$ from a stream of random linear equations over $\mathrm{F}_2$ that are correct with probability $\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon$ and flipped with probability $\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon$, that any learning algorithm requires either a memory of size $Ω(n^2/\varepsilon)$ or an exponential number of samples. In fact, we study memory-sample lower bounds for a large class of learning problems, as characterized by [GRT'18], when the samples are noisy. A matrix $M: A \times X \rightarrow \{-1,1\}$ corresponds to the following learning problem with error parameter $\varepsilon$: an unknown element $x \in X$ is chosen uniformly at random. A learner tries to learn $x$ from a stream of samples, $(a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2) \ldots$, where for every $i$, $a_i \in A$ is chosen uniformly at random and $b_i = M(a_i,x)$ with probability $1/2+\varepsilon$ and $b_i = -M(a_i,x)$ with probability $1/2-\varepsilon$ ($0<\varepsilon< \frac{1}{2}$). Assume that $k,\ell, r$ are such that any submatrix of $M$ of at least $2^{-k} \cdot |A|$ rows and at least $2^{-\ell} \cdot |X|$ columns, has a bias of at most $2^{-r}$. We show that any learning algorithm for the learning problem corresponding to $M$, with error, requires either a memory of size at least $Ω\left(\frac{k \cdot \ell}{\varepsilon} \right)$, or at least $2^{Ω(r)}$ samples. In particular, this shows that for a large class of learning problems, same as those in [GRT'18], any learning algorithm requires either a memory of size at least $Ω\left(\frac{(\log |X|) \cdot (\log |A|)}{\varepsilon}\right)$ or an exponential number of noisy samples. Our proof is based on adapting the arguments in [Raz'17,GRT'18] to the noisy case.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes