Dim but not entirely dark: Extracting the Galactic Center Excess' source-count distribution with neural nets
This addresses the long-standing problem in astrophysics of determining the origin of the Galactic Center Excess, with implications for understanding dark matter or pulsar populations, though it is incremental in refining analysis methods.
The paper tackled the ambiguity in distinguishing between point-source and smooth Poisson emission in the Galactic Center Excess by introducing a unified approach using neural networks for histogram regression, finding a faint source-count distribution peaked at ~4×10^-11 counts cm^-2 s^-1 and constraining the Poissonian fraction to ≤66% at 95% confidence, indicating a substantial point-source contribution.
The two leading hypotheses for the Galactic Center Excess (GCE) in the $\textit{Fermi}$ data are an unresolved population of faint millisecond pulsars (MSPs) and dark-matter (DM) annihilation. The dichotomy between these explanations is typically reflected by modeling them as two separate emission components. However, point-sources (PSs) such as MSPs become statistically degenerate with smooth Poisson emission in the ultra-faint limit (formally where each source is expected to contribute much less than one photon on average), leading to an ambiguity that can render questions such as whether the emission is PS-like or Poissonian in nature ill-defined. We present a conceptually new approach that describes the PS and Poisson emission in a unified manner and only afterwards derives constraints on the Poissonian component from the so obtained results. For the implementation of this approach, we leverage deep learning techniques, centered around a neural network-based method for histogram regression that expresses uncertainties in terms of quantiles. We demonstrate that our method is robust against a number of systematics that have plagued previous approaches, in particular DM / PS misattribution. In the $\textit{Fermi}$ data, we find a faint GCE described by a median source-count distribution (SCD) peaked at a flux of $\sim4 \times 10^{-11} \ \text{counts} \ \text{cm}^{-2} \ \text{s}^{-1}$ (corresponding to $\sim3 - 4$ expected counts per PS), which would require $N \sim \mathcal{O}(10^4)$ sources to explain the entire excess (median value $N = \text{29,300}$ across the sky). Although faint, this SCD allows us to derive the constraint $η_P \leq 66\%$ for the Poissonian fraction of the GCE flux $η_P$ at 95% confidence, suggesting that a substantial amount of the GCE flux is due to PSs.