AIAug 9, 2021

Modified Double DQN: addressing stability

arXiv:2108.04115v26 citations
AI Analysis

This work addresses stability problems in deep reinforcement learning algorithms, which is an incremental improvement for researchers and practitioners in the field.

The paper tackles the instability and overestimation issues in Double-DQN by proposing three modifications focused on decoupling action selection and evaluation and addressing moving targets, with results showing maintained or improved performance in stability and overestimation compared to the original DDQN.

Inspired by Double Q-learning algorithm, the Double-DQN (DDQN) algorithm was originally proposed in order to address the overestimation issue in the original DQN algorithm. The DDQN has successfully shown both theoretically and empirically the importance of decoupling in terms of action evaluation and selection in computation of target values; although, all the benefits were acquired with only a simple adaption to DQN algorithm, minimal possible change as it was mentioned by the authors. Nevertheless, there seems a roll-back in the proposed algorithm of DDQN since the parameters of policy network are emerged again in the target value function which were initially withdrawn by DQN with the hope of tackling the serious issue of moving targets and the instability caused by it (i.e., by moving targets) in the process of learning. Therefore, in this paper three modifications to the DDQN algorithm are proposed with the hope of maintaining the performance in the terms of both stability and overestimation. These modifications are focused on the logic of decoupling the best action selection and evaluation in the target value function and the logic of tackling the moving targets issue. Each of these modifications have their own pros and cons compared to the others. The mentioned pros and cons mainly refer to the execution time required for the corresponding algorithm and the stability provided by the corresponding algorithm. Also, in terms of overestimation, none of the modifications seem to underperform compared to the original DDQN if not outperform it. With the intention of evaluating the efficacy of the proposed modifications, multiple empirical experiments along with theoretical experiments were conducted. The results obtained are represented and discussed in this article.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes