CRLGAug 24, 2021

GGNB: Graph-Based Gaussian Naive Bayes Intrusion Detection System for CAN Bus

arXiv:2108.10908v166 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses cybersecurity vulnerabilities in automotive systems, which are critical for safety, by providing a generalizable and efficient intrusion detection system, though it is incremental as it builds on existing graph and naive Bayes techniques.

The paper tackles the problem of detecting a wide range of cyberattacks on automotive CAN bus systems by proposing a graph-based Gaussian naive Bayes (GGNB) intrusion detection algorithm, achieving high detection accuracies (e.g., up to 100% on some attacks) and significantly reduced computational requirements compared to existing methods.

The national highway traffic safety administration (NHTSA) identified cybersecurity of the automobile systems are more critical than the security of other information systems. Researchers already demonstrated remote attacks on critical vehicular electronic control units (ECUs) using controller area network (CAN). Besides, existing intrusion detection systems (IDSs) often propose to tackle a specific type of attack, which may leave a system vulnerable to numerous other types of attacks. A generalizable IDS that can identify a wide range of attacks within the shortest possible time has more practical value than attack-specific IDSs, which is not a trivial task to accomplish. In this paper we propose a novel {\textbf g}raph-based {\textbf G}aussian {\textbf n}aive {\textbf B}ayes (GGNB) intrusion detection algorithm by leveraging graph properties and PageRank-related features. The GGNB on the real rawCAN data set~\cite{Lee:2017} yields 99.61\%, 99.83\%, 96.79\%, and 96.20\% detection accuracy for denial of service (DoS), fuzzy, spoofing, replay, mixed attacks, respectively. Also, using OpelAstra data set~\cite{Guillaume:2019}, the proposed methodology has 100\%, 99.85\%, 99.92\%, 100\%, 99.92\%, 97.75\% and 99.57\% detection accuracy considering DoS, diagnostic, fuzzing CAN ID, fuzzing payload, replay, suspension, and mixed attacks, respectively. The GGNB-based methodology requires about $239\times$ and $135\times$ lower training and tests times, respectively, compared to the SVM classifier used in the same application. Using Xilinx Zybo Z7 field-programmable gate array (FPGA) board, the proposed GGNB requires $5.7 \times$, $5.9 \times$, $5.1 \times$, and $3.6 \times$ fewer slices, LUTs, flip-flops, and DSP units, respectively, than conventional NN architecture.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes