Identifying Morality Frames in Political Tweets using Relational Learning
This work addresses the need to understand public opinion and social movements by analyzing moral sentiment in political discourse, but it is incremental as it builds on existing Moral Foundation Theory with a new relational learning approach.
The paper tackled the problem of extracting moral sentiment from political tweets by introducing morality frames to organize moral attitudes directed at different entities, and created an annotated dataset of US politicians' tweets. The result showed that moral sentiment towards entities differs highly across political ideologies, as demonstrated through qualitative and quantitative evaluations.
Extracting moral sentiment from text is a vital component in understanding public opinion, social movements, and policy decisions. The Moral Foundation Theory identifies five moral foundations, each associated with a positive and negative polarity. However, moral sentiment is often motivated by its targets, which can correspond to individuals or collective entities. In this paper, we introduce morality frames, a representation framework for organizing moral attitudes directed at different entities, and come up with a novel and high-quality annotated dataset of tweets written by US politicians. Then, we propose a relational learning model to predict moral attitudes towards entities and moral foundations jointly. We do qualitative and quantitative evaluations, showing that moral sentiment towards entities differs highly across political ideologies.