Efficient Multiple Constraint Acquisition
This work addresses efficiency issues in constraint acquisition for non-expert users, representing an incremental improvement over existing methods.
The paper tackles the bottlenecks of high query counts and CPU times in constraint acquisition systems like QuAcq and MultiAcq by proposing algorithmic and heuristic methods, resulting in an integrated algorithm that generates significantly fewer queries and is much faster, alleviating premature convergence.
Constraint acquisition systems such as QuAcq and MultiAcq can assist non-expert users to model their problems as constraint networks by classifying (partial) examples as positive or negative. For each negative example, the former focuses on one constraint of the target network, while the latter can learn a maximum number of constraints. Two bottlenecks of the acquisition process where both these algorithms encounter problems are the large number of queries required to reach convergence, and the high cpu times needed to generate queries, especially near convergence. In this paper we propose algorithmic and heuristic methods to deal with both these issues. We first describe an algorithm, called MQuAcq, that blends the main idea of MultiAcq into QuAcq resulting in a method that learns as many constraints as MultiAcq does after a negative example, but with a lower complexity. A detailed theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithm is also presented. %We also present a technique that boosts the performance of constraint acquisition by reducing the number of queries significantly. Then we turn our attention to query generation which is a significant but rather overlooked part of the acquisition process. We describe %in detail how query generation in a typical constraint acquisition system operates, and we propose heuristics for improving its efficiency. Experiments from various domains demonstrate that our resulting algorithm that integrates all the new techniques does not only generate considerably fewer queries than QuAcq and MultiAcq, but it is also by far faster than both of them, in average query generation time as well as in total run time, and also largely alleviates the premature convergence problem.