SESep 21, 2021

A Quality Assessment Instrument for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering

arXiv:2109.10134v110 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This provides a structured tool for researchers and practitioners in software engineering to assess SLR quality, though it is incremental as it adapts an existing instrument from healthcare.

The researchers tackled the problem of varying quality in systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in software engineering by developing a quality assessment instrument, resulting in a 16-item tool with graded scales for appraisers and authors to evaluate and improve review quality.

Context: Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have become standard practise as part of software engineering research, although their quality varies. To build on the reviews, both for future research and industry practice, they need to be of high quality. Objective: To assess the quality of SLRs in software engineering, we put forward an appraisal instrument for SLRs. The instrument is intended for use by appraisers of reviews, but authors may also use it as a checklist when designing and documenting their reviews. Method: A well-established appraisal instrument from research in healthcare was used as a starting point to develop a quality assessment instrument. It is adapted to software engineering using guidelines, checklists, and experiences from software engineering. As a validation step, the first version was reviewed by four external experts on SLRs in software engineering and updated based on their feedback. Results: The outcome of the research is an appraisal instrument for the quality assessment of SLRs in software engineering. The instrument intends to support the appraiser in assessing the quality of an SLR. The instrument includes 16 items with different options to capture the quality. The item is assessed on a two or three-grade scale, depending on the item. The instrument also supports consolidating the items into groups, which are then used to assess the overall quality of a systematic literature review. Conclusion: It is concluded that the presented instrument may be helpful support for an appraiser in assessing the quality of SLRs in software engineering.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes