Cramér-Rao bound-informed training of neural networks for quantitative MRI
This work addresses a domain-specific problem in medical imaging by providing a theoretically grounded method to enhance neural network training for MRI parameter estimation, representing an incremental improvement over existing approaches.
The paper tackles the challenge of training neural networks for quantitative MRI parameter estimation in heterogeneous parameter spaces by introducing a Cramér-Rao bound (CRB)-informed loss function, which balances contributions across parameters and improves performance over mean squared error loss in numerical, phantom, and in vivo experiments.
Neural networks are increasingly used to estimate parameters in quantitative MRI, in particular in magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Their advantages over the gold standard non-linear least square fitting are their superior speed and their immunity to the non-convexity of many fitting problems. We find, however, that in heterogeneous parameter spaces, i.e. in spaces in which the variance of the estimated parameters varies considerably, good performance is hard to achieve and requires arduous tweaking of the loss function, hyper parameters, and the distribution of the training data in parameter space. Here, we address these issues with a theoretically well-founded loss function: the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) provides a theoretical lower bound for the variance of an unbiased estimator and we propose to normalize the squared error with respective CRB. With this normalization, we balance the contributions of hard-to-estimate and not-so-hard-to-estimate parameters and areas in parameter space, and avoid a dominance of the former in the overall training loss. Further, the CRB-based loss function equals one for a maximally-efficient unbiased estimator, which we consider the ideal estimator. Hence, the proposed CRB-based loss function provides an absolute evaluation metric. We compare a network trained with the CRB-based loss with a network trained with the commonly used means squared error loss and demonstrate the advantages of the former in numerical, phantom, and in vivo experiments.